REVISION PEARLS: Evaluating and Managing Flexion Instability after TKA
Editor’s Note: ICJR’s annual Revision Hip & Knee Course is one of the most popular continuing medical education activities we host. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, however, the course – which would have started on Thursday, June 18 – had to be canceled this year. Although the course will not be held, this week we’ll be highlighting some of the highest-rated sessions from past meetings and offering a special discount for you to attend the course in 2021.
In 1993, Arlen D. Hanssen, MD, and David G. Lewallen, MD, noticed a phenomenon among total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who were being referred to them with “weird infections”: The patients didn’t have infections, they had flexion instability.
Dr. Hanssen believes flexion instability is the number 1 cause of the so-called “unhappy knee.” But 25 years after he and Dr. Lewallen first identified flexion instability, and 20 years since they and their colleagues from Mayo Clinic first wrote about it,  he is amazed by how many surgeons either don’t understand flexion instability, deny that it’s a clinical issue, or don’t know how to evaluate and treat patients who clearly have symptoms of this pathology.
SPECIAL DISCOUNT! Through June 30, click here to take 30% off the regular registration fee for the 8th Annual Revision Hip & Knee Course, June 17-19, 2021; discount code 2021revintro
Speaking at ICJR’s annual Revision Hip & Knee Course, Dr. Hanssen reviewed the presenting symptoms, physical examination, and stepwise surgical plan for correcting flexion instability.
Patients who are found to have flexion instability generally have these traits:
- They had excellent early postoperative range of motion, but that’ because they had a loose flexion space from the beginning, Dr. Hanssen said.
- They have recurrent effusions.
- They have subtle symptoms of instability, such as difficulty going up and down the stairs and not trusting their knee on rough, uneven ground.
- They have peripatellar and pes bursitis symptoms.
On examination, the surgeon will find variable levels of effusion in these patients, with bloody fluid aspiration in 70% to 85% of patients, and areas of anterior tenderness. The surgeon should also:
- Evaluate anteroposterior stability at 90° with the patient sitting up, the affected leg dangling over the table, and the hamstrings relaxed. The surgeon grasps the leg under the knee and pulls forward on the calf to feel the AP translation.
- Perform a “knock” test, putting a hand under the patient’s thigh and rocking the leg back and forth. In a patient with flexion instability, the surgeon will feel the tibial plateau rocking on both condyles because the patient has an open flexion space.
There are 4 correctable variables in flexion instability: axial alignment/component malrotation, tibial slope, undersized femur, and distalized femur. The process of correcting these variables should be done in a logical, sequential manner: 
- Correct malrotation and axial alignment
- Reduce the tibial slope
- Upsize the femoral component and use augments as needed
- Perform additional femoral resection and increase the polyethylene thickness to balance the flexion/extension gap
Click the image above to watch Dr. Hanssen’s presentation on flexion instability.
Disclosure: Dr. Hanssen has disclosed that he receives royalties from Styker.
- Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ. Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):39-46.
- Abdel MP, Pulido L, Severson EP, Hanssen AD. Stepwise surgical correction of instability in flexion after total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014 Dec;96-B(12):1644-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34821.