0
    399
    views

    Anatomic Tunnel Drilling in ACL Reconstruction

    Is there a preferred drilling technique for tunnel placement when reconstructing a torn anterior cruciate ligament?

    Author

    Michael B. Banffy, MD

    Disclosures

    The author has no disclosures relevant to this article.

    Ultimately, the goal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to restore normal knee kinematics in a patient with an ACL-deficient knee. It is hypothesized that abnormal joint forces will occur during activity in an ACL-deficient knee, which could lead to the development of osteoarthritis. [1,2]

    The ACL plays an important role in both anterior tibial translation and rotation with respect to the femur. This stability is conferred through a ligament that takes the proper anatomical load.

    During ACL reconstruction, the femoral tunnel can be drilled in either a transtibial or an independent drilling technique. Several studies have documented that the transtibial technique leads to a vertical non-anatomic position of the ACL on the femur. [3-7] Independent tunnel drilling through a two incision technique, or now more commonly through an anteromedial portal, more consistently reproduces the normal anatomic footprint on the femur. [4,5]

    One reason for failure after ACL reconstruction is persistent rotational instability. Biomechanically, a graft placed in the non-anatomic position will have decreased rotational stability. [8,9] Drilling from an anteromedial portal allows the surgeon to place the single-bundle ACL at the center of the anatomic footprint, ideally leading to anatomic rotational and translational restraints.

    It is possible that a graft placed in the non-anatomic position will be unable to reproduce the physiologic restraint provided by the normal ACL, leading to this persistent instability. Xu et al [10] showed that a non-anatomic position of the ACL leads to decreased loads conferred by the reconstructed ligament.

    Despite the biomechanical evidence, there is little clinical evidence comparing the outcomes of transtibial versus anatomic femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction. A recent article by Duffee et al [11] presents the outcomes for a large cohort of patients comparing transtibial to anteromedial tunnel drilling. The authors found a statistically significant increase in repeat ipsilateral knee surgery in patients treated with the transtibial technique. These surgeries ranged from revision ACL reconstruction to meniscal and cartilage procedures, suggesting recurrent instability in those patients with non-anatomic grafts. Although a robust study, there clearly needs to be more clinical data supporting the use of independent drilling.

    Overall, ACL reconstruction has an excellent, 80% success rate. Cadaveric and radiologic studies have shown that anteromedial and two-incision techniques better recreate the anatomical femoral footprint. With new data supporting anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel and increased utilization of independent drilling techniques, it is possible that the success of ACL reconstruction may further improve.

    Biomechanical and now clinical studies show that anatomic grafts lead to improved rotational stability and decreased revision surgeries. Further clinical evidence will likely continue to support the use of anatomic femoral tunnel drilling.

    Author Information

    Michael B. Banffy, MD, is an orthopaedic surgeon with Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic in Los Angeles, California. He specializes in sports medicine, joint preservation, and joint reconstruction.

    References

    1. Oiestad BE, Holm I, Aune AK, et al. Knee function and prevalence of knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate reconstructions: a prospective study with 10-15 year follow up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2201-10.
    2. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequences of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2007;16:323-9.
    3. Abebe ES, Moorman CT 3rd, Dziedzic TS, et al. Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel independent techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1904-11.Epub 2009 Aug 17.
    4. Arnold MP, Kooloos J, van Kampen A. Single-incision technique misses the anatomic femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(4):194-9.
    5. Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, et al. Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(3):220-7.
    6. Gavrilidis I, Motsis EK, Pakos EE, et al. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee 2008; 15(5):364-7.
    7. Kaseta MK, DeFrate LE, Chamock BL, et al. Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relate Res 2008; 466(6):1467-74.
    8. Steiner ME, Battaglia TC, Heming JF, et al. Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1912-9.
    9. Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, et al. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic double bundle, anatomic single bundle, and nonanatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):279-88.
    10. Xu Y, Liu J, Kramer S, et al. Comparison of in situ forces and knee kinematics in anteromedial and high anteromedial bundle augmentation for partially ruptured anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):272-8.
    11. Duffee A, Magnussen R, Pedroza A, et al. Transtibial ACL Femoral Tunnel Preparation Increases Odds of Repeat Ipsilateral Knee Surgery. JBJS. 2013;29:2035-42.