0
    199
    views

    10 Tips for Managing Anterior Shoulder Instability

    Although anterior shoulder instability is fairly common, not every case of dislocation can be treated in the same way. The authors offer advice to help surgeons manage these patients.

    Authors

    Mark A. Schrumpf, MD, and Tom R. Norris, MD

    Disclosures

    The authors have no disclosures relevant to this article.

    Introduction

    Anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint is a common clinical entity. While recognizing and treating the acute presentation of a dislocation or subluxation is a fairly straightforward exercise, managing that patient to prevent future episodes of instability requires a thorough understanding of the patient and his or her injury.

    In short, not every anterior shoulder dislocation can be managed in an identical fashion. Below are tips and tricks that can help improve the surgeon’s success in managing these patients.

    1. Beware of patients who have a shortened arc of bipolar contact between the head and glenoid (glenoid fractures and Hill-Sachs lesions).

    Osseous lesions are known to be present in 89% of failed surgical stabilizations. [1] Bone loss on the anterior glenoid rim greater than 15% to 20% of the surface should be considered for bony reconstruction or augmentation to restore the force needed for dislocation. [2,3] Hill-Sachs lesions greater than 30% of the head should also be addressed.

    Bone loss on the glenoid can be addressed with a coracoid transfer (for example, Bristow or Latarjet), a block of auto (iliac crest), or an allograft (distal tibia). The Latarjet procedure has had a surge in popularity as recent long-term follow-up studies have shown rates of recurrent instability of less the 6% at 20 years. [4] Regardless of the source of the bone, the most important aspect of the procedure is restoration of the normal anatomic width of the glenoid.

    2. Surgeons should be more aggressive in treating patients who are young, as well as contact athletes.

    The risk of recurrence will be greater in these individuals than older more sedentary patients. While patients with a first-time dislocation probably have a less than 50% chance of having another instability event over the first 10 years following the event, [5] patients who are less than 24 years old and are athletes show recurrence rates approaching 90%. [6]

    3. Although age and athletic status have profound effects on recurrent traumatic anterior instability, gender appears to have little impact on the outcome or long-term disability resulting from surgical management of a simple Bankart lesion. [7]

    Although multidirectional instability (MDI) is more common in females, those patients are managed with a different algorithm and frequently do not have a Bankart lesion. The prevalence of Bankart lesions is greater in male patients than females, with 70% to 80% of lesions being seen in males. This observed difference is likely due to increased exposure to traumatic events, not due to an underlying difference in anatomy or physiology. [8]

    4. Watch out for rotator cuff tears secondary to a dislocation in older patients. 

    In patients over age 40 years, dislocations can result in full-thickness tears of the subscapularis and supraspinatus. Leaving these tears unaddressed can result in recurrent instability and poor shoulder function. [9]

    5. Patients with MDI respond poorly to isolated arthroscopic instability repairs.

    These patients often do not have a characteristic Bankart lesion at arthroscopy. [10] While a capsular plication can be performed, the incidence of clinical failure is much greater in this patient population than in traumatic unidirectional instability patients. Instead, prolonged physical therapy directed at the rotator cuff, deltoid, and scapular stabilizers are the standard of care.

    6. With arthroscopic repairs, the surgeon should focus on repairing the labrum and capsule back to the glenoid rim and eliminating any capsular redundancy. [11]

    Without reconstruction of concavity-compression created by addressing capsule, ligament and labrum, recurrent instability is much more likely (Figure 1).

    Figure 1. A suture passer is used to capture the labrum and the redundant capsule. Both layers are incorporated into the repair.

    7. In subacute and chronic cases, it is critical to release the scarred labrum and capsule from its position along the glenoid neck and allow it to float back to its anatomic location before fixation.

    The “bumper” must be placed on the rim or surface of the glenoid, as that dictates the amount of force needed for dislocation (Figure 2). [12] Repair in a more medial position is unlikely to restore stability.

    Figure 2. The arthroscopic labral elevator is used medially along the neck of the glenoid to free any scar and allow the labrum to float back to its anatomic position.

    8. Recurrent instability after a repair, especially from a non-traumatic event, should be considered for open treatment.

    The risk for recurrent instability is lower when an open Bankart repair is performed. [13]

    9. There are few good indications for an arthrodesis in patients with anterior instability.

    However, an arthrodesis may be considered in patients with an axillary nerve palsy resulting in a flaccid deltoid and uncontrollable glenohumeral instability. These patients are exceedingly rare, not generally considered part and parcel of traumatic unidirectional instability.

    10. The indications for surface replacement or hemiarthroplasty as treatment for the sequellae of anterior instability are limited to older patients with large Hill-Sachs lesions. [14]

    For younger or high-demand patients, reconstruction of the Hill-Sachs lesion with an osteoarticular allograft is often a superior choice. [15] Addressing the underlying cause of shoulder instability is essential for successful outcomes in these patients. Finally, if there are irreparable tears of the cuff encountered at the time of arthroplasty, especially of the subscapularis, a reverse total shoulder may be a more appropriate implant choice as it is a semi constrained prosthesis.

    Conclusion

    The management of anterior shoulder instability requires the treating surgeon to uncover the underlying causes of the instability and address them systematically.

    For many patients, closed reduction and early mobilization are adequate to restore shoulder function. However, if the patient is young, a high-demand contact athlete, or has either a bony lesion of the glenoid rim or a large lesion of the humeral head, additional interventions are often necessary to avoid future instability events.

    Author Information

    Mark A. Schrumpf, MD, and Tom R. Norris, MD, are orthopaedic surgeons practicing at California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California. They specialize in shoulder and elbow surgery.

    References

    1. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. 2000 Oct;16(7): 677-94.
    2. Yamamoto N, Muraki T, Sperling JW, Steinmann SP, Cofield RH, Itoi E, An KN. Stabilizing mechanism in bone-grafting of a large glenoid defect. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep 1;92(11):2059-66.
    3. Schrumpf, M.A. , Maak T.G., Delos,D. Jones K.J., Dines, D.M., Walch, G., Dines J.S., The management of bone loss associated with anterior glenohumeral instability, Journals of Bone and Joint Surgery Am; Jan 15;96(2): e 12
    4. Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P, Melis B, Walch G. Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for anterior instability of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 May 13
    5. Hovelius L, Augustini BG, Fredin H, Johansson O, Norlin R, Thorling J. Primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder in young patients. A ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1677-84.
    6. Taylor DC, Arciero RA. Pathologic changes associated with shoulder dislocations. Arthroscopic and physical examination findings in first-time, traumatic anterior dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 1997 May-Jun;25(3):306-11.
    7. Waterman BR, Burns TC, McCriskin B, Kilcoyne K, Cameron KL, Owens BD. Outcomes after Bankart repair in a military population: predictors for surgical revision and long-term disability. Arthroscopy. 2014 Feb;30(2):172-7.
    8. Frank RM, Saccomanno MF, McDonald LS, Moric M, Romeo AA, Provencher MT. Outcomes of Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Instability in the Beach Chair Versus Lateral Decubitus Position: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jul 4
    9. Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ, Neviaser JS. Anterior dislocation of the shoulder and rotator cuff rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jun;(291):103-6.
    10. Neer CS 2nd, Foster CR. Inferior capsular shift for involuntary inferior and multidirectional instability of the shoulder. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Sep;62(6):897-908.
    11. Gartsman G.M., Roddey T.S., Hammerman, S.M. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 July; 82-A (7): 991-1002
    12. Yamamoto N1, Muraki T, Sperling JW, Steinmann SP, Itoi E, Cofield RH, An KN., Does the “bumper” created during Bankart repair contribute to shoulder stability, JSES 2013 Jun;22(6) 823-34.
    13. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Hollinshead RM, Boorman RS, Hiemstra LA, Lo IK, Hannaford HN, Fredine J, Sasyniuk TM, Paolucci EO. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 5;96(5):353-60
    14. Armitage MS1, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, Litchfield RB, Athwal GS. Humeral head bone defects: remplissage, allograft, and arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Jul;41(3):417-25
    15. Kropf EJ, Sekiya JK. Osteoarticular allograft transplantation for large humeral head defects in glenohumeral instability. Arthroscopy 2007 Mar; 23(3): 322